ChiefsCountry.com

Where you find the best fans in the land!
 
It is currently Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:52 am

Contact Us | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Welcome
Welcome to chiefscountry

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Why Charlie and Romeo are good for the Chiefs.
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:31 am 
Offline
Contributor

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:04 pm
Posts: 64
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
My TV rarely is on anything other then ESPN. Most the time I don't even pay attention to it. But when I hear the word Chiefs It grabs my attention. On ESPN I have heard a number of talking heads talk about how this is not a great hire for the Chiefs. There reason is simply this. That the new OC and Dc have not had success outside of new England. To me that's not a fair statement. Or even fair to bring up. Why?

The main thing is that the two had much different jobs from when they left New England. That being a head coach. They are not being asked to be a head coach in Kansas City they are being asked to be the OC and Dc of the team. That's all. The Head coaching position is entirely different and you can be a good Coordination without being a good head coach. Can We say that its a great hire at this second probably not but if you look at the track record of the two as OC and DC is pretty encouraging.

Its not like the two did not have any success when they were not in New England. Charlie Weis built a Great offense while he was at Noter Dame. That was not the problem for the fighting Irish. The problem was that Charlie could never get a defense that could cover there own shadow. That's not what hes being asked to do in KC. The thing he is being asked to do is to help build an offense something that he showed he can do outside of New England already.

As for Remeo he stayed in the NFL and went to a team the well In all reality has never done any thing since they got back into the NFL in 1999. Yes he failed at his job but he came the closest that anyone has came to getting success. I can not sit here and tell you that I thougt he did a horrible job with the Browns. But like Weis he is not being asked to be a Head coach. Romeo has had a lot of success being a DC so there is no reason to think that he wont be able to get the job done in KC.

I truly hope that both work out and are great fits to help Todd Haley and Get the Chiefs to at least as many super bowl wins then what they have in New England. I am excited about the two hires. I think that both will work out for a long time in KC. GO CHIEFS!!! :chieflogo:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why Charlie and Romeo are good for the Chiefs.
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:37 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:23 am
Posts: 1621
Location: SE Kansas
Has thanked: 3 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Highscores: 1
I agree. Both these coaches are being brought back into their element. Good read!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why Charlie and Romeo are good for the Chiefs.
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:21 pm 
Offline
Global Moderator

Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 289
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
TribalChief wrote:
I agree. Both these coaches are being brought back into their element. Good read!


well I have high hopes-but I always do in the offseason-lol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why Charlie and Romeo are good for the Chiefs.
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:45 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:23 am
Posts: 1621
Location: SE Kansas
Has thanked: 3 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Highscores: 1
Halfcan wrote:
TribalChief wrote:
I agree. Both these coaches are being brought back into their element. Good read!


well I have high hopes-but I always do in the offseason-lol


You and me both buddy!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why Charlie and Romeo are good for the Chiefs.
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:25 am 
Offline
Starter

Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:11 am
Posts: 629
Location: between lost and nowhere, southcentral,ks.
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Halfcan wrote:
TribalChief wrote:
I agree. Both these coaches are being brought back into their element. Good read!


well I have high hopes-but I always do in the offseason-lol

after all these years i have learned not to get to up for the offseason.
To me me after all these years, there has been only four movements by the chiefs that got "excited" that the chiefs have made.
1) hiring marty. after years of flyby night coaches and he was proven
2) hiring of vermil. just off a superbowl win and his offenses
3) signing willie roaf. it was the big signing that got holmes and the offense going
4) firing of queen carl. enough said
To many years of cheapnest by the hunt family and stupid signings by peterson has led to bad offseasons

_________________
"old enough to remember what a red and gold super bowl looks like"
"hopefully young enough to see another"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why Charlie and Romeo are good for the Chiefs.
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:23 am
Posts: 1621
Location: SE Kansas
Has thanked: 3 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Highscores: 1
wolfpack wrote:
Halfcan wrote:
TribalChief wrote:
I agree. Both these coaches are being brought back into their element. Good read!


well I have high hopes-but I always do in the offseason-lol

after all these years i have learned not to get to up for the offseason.
To me me after all these years, there has been only four movements by the chiefs that got "excited" that the chiefs have made.
1) hiring marty. after years of flyby night coaches and he was proven
2) hiring of vermil. just off a superbowl win and his offenses
3) signing willie roaf. it was the big signing that got holmes and the offense going
4) firing of queen carl. enough said
To many years of cheapnest by the hunt family and stupid signings by peterson has led to bad offseasons


Unfortunately the business aspect of the game tends to over-shadow the game itself.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

Contact Us | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
 
suspicion-preferred