|
| Welcome |
|
Welcome to chiefscountry
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! |
 
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
wolfpack
|
Post subject: For those who wanted wilford or hampton well Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:46 am |
|
 |
| Starter |
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:11 am
Posts: 630
Location: between lost and nowhere, southcentral,ks.
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
|
|
For those who wanted wilford or hampton well,, wilford has been tagged and hampton just signed.
From rotoworld.com
KDKA-TV Sports in Pittsburgh reports the Steelers have agreed to terms with NT Casey Hampton on a three-year, $21 million contract.
The contract calls for $11 million in guarantees. Hampton would have received $7 million in 2009 alone if he had been franchised. The three-year deal makes sense for both sides, giving the 32-year-old security while allowing the Steelers to retain their run-stuffer for more than one season.
Packers designated NT Ryan Pickett as their franchise player.
Pickett, 30, isn't a pocket pusher, but anchored Green Bay's No. 1 run defense in 2009 as a run-clogging, double team-commanding nose tackle. The sides still hope to work out a multi-year deal before the mid-July deadline. Pickett's franchise tag guarantees him at least a $7.003 million salary for 2010.
Drafting a NT is going to be pretty important now that those two are off the board
_________________
"old enough to remember what a red and gold super bowl looks like"
"hopefully young enough to see another"
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TribalChief
|
Post subject: Re: For those who wanted wilford or hampton well Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:44 pm |
|
|
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:23 am
Posts: 1646
Location: SE Kansas
Has thanked: 3 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Highscores: 1
|
|
I think those were probably long shots at best anyway.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|
